Among the claims Badrinath attacked was one that India had eliminated the threat of famine.
In a letter to The Hindu, Krishnaswamy accused Badrinath of taking a jaundiced view of history. Deliberately or unwittingly, he revealed a secret: that the capsule ran into 30 pages.
Indira denied any knowledge of the contents and the ICHR demanded an explanation from Krishnaswamy for "breaching secrecy" by giving Badrinath a copy and making revelations.
Union minister and Congress member S. Jaipal Reddy today refused to compare Modi's capsule with Indira's, saying merely: "Time capsules are not required in a democracy. If there are to be capsules, they should record scientific achievements and facts and not socio-political issues, which lend themselves to different interpretations at different points of time."
BJP spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad justified Modi's capsules: "After all, Gujarat has a chequered history from Gandhiji, Patel and Jivraj Mehta (to Modi). It is India's fastest-growing state, so the new initiatives must be recorded for posterity."
He added: "Hers (Indira's) was a personal eulogy; his (Modi's) is an objective account."
Some media reports have said Mayavati is planning a time capsule of her own, suggesting the possible birth of a new trend among Indian politicians to try and immortalise themselves for posterity.
In the US, many institutions and research organisations have been burying time capsules since the early 20th century, often with specific instructions on when they are to be dug out and unlocked —ranging from periods as small as 25 years to 1,000 years.
Many time capsules were buried in the erstwhile USSR too, with messages to people of future communist societies.
Four time capsules are now travelling in space, with a fifth to be launched next year aboard the KEO satellite. It will carry messages for humans around the year 52,000 when the satellite is to return to Earth.
There's even an International Time Capsule Society at the Oglethorpe University in Atlanta, the US, to maintain a global database of all existing time capsules.
But time capsules have their critics, who say the material they carry is more often than not merely "useless junk" that tells little about the people of the time.
Scoop from the NET
Nandakumar
No comments:
Post a Comment